Vajrayoginī

Tibetan Buddhist · deity · mythic · deity

VAJRAVARAHI IS CARRIED AS AN ALIAS AND NOT AS A SECOND RECORD. The two names are used for forms that the practice traditions distinguish, but the retrieved treatment names them together and gives no act to either separately, and this programme does not split a record on a distinction its sources do not draw. A YIDAM IS NOT A GOD THE PRACTITIONER PETITIONS; IT IS A FORM THE PRACTITIONER TAKES. The schema's vocabulary has no category for that, so type is deity because it is the nearest one available, and the record says so rather than letting the field make the claim. Lane 26 escalated this; nothing is decided here.

Domains

Relations

Sources

Open in the interactive app →